16923

SoSe 23: Reading Hitler: (auto-)biography as history

Daniel Louis Nethery

Kommentar

Subject: Biographer Ian Kershaw argued that the legacy of Adolf Hitler ‘belongs to us all’ and that ‘part of that legacy is the continuing duty to seek understanding of how Hitler was possible.’ For that purpose Kershaw saw a biographical approach to Hitler as indispensable. But he warned that biography ‘runs the natural risk of over-personalizing complex historical developments, [and] over-emphasizing the role of the individual in shaping and determining events’. Biography, then, poses dilemmas which arise whenever we seek to understand human affairs, past or present. Program: We will draw on several biographies of Hitler and of those close to him to study important episodes in his personal and political career. We will read about his childhood, his experience of war and peace, and his accumulation of power, first in the Nazi party, then in the German parliament and government. We will consider his role in the drafting of the Nuremberg laws and the Munich agreement, and discuss the ways in which biographers have responded to the question of his personal responsibility for the war and the holocaust. And we will see that even the circumstances of his death gave rise to a debate over the role of government in the dissemination of information, which reappeared in a different aspect when historians came to edit his autobiography, Mein Kampf, seventy years later. Is this course for me? This course will complement a program of study in the humanities and social sciences and be of particular interest to students of history, politics and international relations. There are no prerequisites. Workload and assessment: You will qualify for 5 ECTS points if you engage with the course materials, your attendance is satisfactory, and you pass the written examination at the end of the semester. Schließen